Unusual excuses do not sway courts after CRA denies CERB eligibility

Jamie Golombek: Taxpayers have been unwilling to offer crucial proof of earnings to say advantages in two current circumstances

Article content material

Till lately, I by no means totally appreciated the which means behind the excuse, “The canine ate my homework.” That modified this previous summer time with the arrival of Jasper, our new golden retriever pet. Constant together with his breed’s genetic disposition, I seen he was a fast research when it got here to retrieving the newspaper from the entrance stoop. Sadly, by the point the paper made it inside, it was not readable as he had shredded it to items.

Commercial 2

Article content material

I can’t recall a taxpayer ever saying “the canine ate my homework” as a defence in courtroom for failing to offer backup documentation that the Canada Income Company was requesting, however a few of the excuses they provide you with can sometimes pressure credulity. Take two current circumstances coping with COVID-19 advantages eligibility, and the taxpayers’ unwillingness (or, maybe, lack of ability) to offer the required proof of earnings.

Article content material

The primary case, determined in late December 2023, concerned a self-employed taxpayer who utilized for and acquired the Canada Emergency Response Profit (CERB) for the complete seven four-week durations and the Canada Restoration Profit (CRB) for the following 27 two-week durations. The CRA discovered her ineligible as a result of she had not earned no less than $5,000 of (self-)employment earnings within the prior interval.

The taxpayer had prior work expertise conducting patent agent- and engineering-related work. In 2018, she labored as a patent agent trainee at a nationwide mental property regulation agency. Previous to this, she labored as a patent agent in america.

In December 2019, the taxpayer allegedly acquired a job provide to work remotely as an unbiased contractor for {an electrical} gear firm. On this position, she was to offer patent-related recommendation and analysis to her shopper and be paid US$6,200 (or roughly $8,000 on the time). On the taxpayer’s 2020 tax return, she claimed $4,200 for bills regarding the enterprise use of her dwelling, leading to her 2020 web self-employed enterprise earnings totalling $3,800. This was under the $5,000 earnings eligibility threshold to obtain CERB or CRB.

Article content material

Commercial 3

Article content material

After consulting with an accountant, the taxpayer lately amended her 2020 tax return and adjusted her use-of-home bills right down to $2,100 since, based on her, “she additionally used her work space for research and leisure time.” After the modification, her self-employment web enterprise earnings was $5,900.

Her COVID-19 advantages have been chosen for evaluate by the CRA, and an agent known as her requesting documentation to confirm her self-employment earnings. She subsequently supplied a single bill and several other letters from the corporate “with restricted element.” After conducting each a first- and second-level evaluate, the CRA decided she was not eligible as she hadn’t earned the requisite $5,000 of earnings.

The taxpayer appealed the CRA’s second-level determination to the Federal Courtroom requesting a judicial evaluate. The courtroom’s position is to not substitute its determination for that of the CRA officer, however to find out whether or not the CRA’s determination was “cheap” contemplating the details and proof. An inexpensive determination is “one primarily based on an internally coherent and rational chain of research that’s justified, clear and intelligible in relation to the relevant factual and authorized constraints.”

Commercial 4

Article content material

The choose reviewed all of the proof, together with the CRA’s detailed and complete determination experiences. In these experiences, the CRA agent famous the taxpayer had no earlier historical past of incomes self-employment earnings, and supplied no documentation to assist that she had really acquired the US$6,200, or that this quantity was despatched by way of licensed mail.

As well as, the bill submitted to the company by the taxpayer didn’t point out whether or not it had been paid, the kind of cost or the date of cost, and it wasn’t signed by both social gathering. The letter settlement was not a proper contract and solely briefly indicated the character of the engagement. However maybe most significantly, all of the paperwork the taxpayer supplied from the company have been created years after she claimed to have been paid the US$6,200, and failed to point the precise date of cost.

The CRA concluded the bill and accompanying letters from the company didn’t represent ample convincing proof of a cost having been made to the taxpayer within the absence of an precise switch or receipt of cash. The choose acknowledged that the taxpayer “is definitely entitled to be remunerated in money,” however it was her duty to keep up ample information as a way to depend on money funds to assist her eligibility for the CERB or CRB advantages.

Commercial 5

Article content material

The choose concluded the CRA agent had “meticulously assessed the proof supplied by (the taxpayer) and located it was inadequate to ascertain her eligibility.” The choose, subsequently, dominated the CRA’s determination to disclaim the profit was cheap, because it had “all of the requisite attributes of transparency, justification, and intelligibility.”

The second COVID-19 advantages eligibility case, additionally determined in December 2023, was a follow-up determination of the Federal Courtroom involving a self-employed bookkeeper in British Columbia who operates his enterprise by way of various corporations. The CRA decided he was not entitled to the CRB on the idea he had not earned no less than $5,000 of (self-)employment earnings. In October 2022, the taxpayer utilized for judicial evaluate and succeeded on the idea that the CRA breached “procedural equity” by failing to advise him that it required additional documentation past his T4 and T4A slips.

Associated Tales

Commercial 6

Article content material

The CRA requested the taxpayer’s financial institution statements to confirm his earnings, however the taxpayer refused, saying: “I’m a non-public citizen; I worth my proper to privateness and my civil liberties. I can’t disclose private, personal and confidential info akin to financial institution statements as I worth my proper to privateness and my civil liberties, as a non-public citizen. Personally, I’m not a enterprise. Asking for my private, personal and confidential statements, is a breach of my civil liberty.”

This didn’t go over properly with the choose, who dismissed the taxpayer’s second request for judicial evaluate: “It’s (the taxpayer’s) proper to refuse to offer the requested info; nevertheless, he can’t now criticize that the CRA decided it had inadequate info to assist his declare.”

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].

In the event you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

Article content material